A review process people actually finish, focused on growth, with ratings that mean the same thing across every team.
Short forms, the same for everyone. Each question asks for specific examples where possible.
| Direction | Who writes it | The questions |
|---|---|---|
| Self | The employee |
|
| Peer | 1 to 2 teammates |
|
| Upward | Direct reports, about their manager |
|
| Manager | The manager, about each report |
|
Decide visibility up front. Tell people before they write whether peer and upward feedback will be shared word for word, summarized by the manager, or kept anonymous. Changing it afterward breaks trust.
A predictable rhythm. Publish the dates before week one so nobody is surprised.
Monday to Wednesday: choose peers and send requests. Thursday: the feedback tool opens for 2.5 weeks.
Everyone writes self, peer, and upward feedback. Send reminders midway through.
Managers write their assessments and draft ratings, then leaders calibrate together.
Managers finalize and deliver feedback in a live conversation, never just a shared document.
Leaders review draft ratings side by side to make sure a "4" on one team means the same as a "4" on another. Bring evidence, not adjectives. Adjust before anyone sees their rating.
Plus the editable Word template.